The Spoken Word

I’ve been writing my blog since January, about 90 separate posts! Thanks to all for reading, as there have been in excess of 6000 views! During this past summer I spent some time thinking about creating a video, a different approach for me, a way of sharing my ideas in spoken format, something that could be accessible to an even wider audience. So with the help of a colleague and a high school student I taped a short segment. The topic of the video is the need for and benefit of having common goals. I was focusing on common directions for a school, of course, but any organization or endeavor needs to have in place objectives that are shared by the members of the group and that further the aims of that group. The video segment was not edited, I didn’t redo parts of it, I just talked and the video was made in one take. You can view it at:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LCNpv4Zqr14&feature=youtu.be

I would appreciate any and all feedback. Please share your thoughts with me; write a comment in response to this post. Don’t worry about offending me, you won’t. I’ve watched it a few times and have several suggestions for myself. But, hearing from a wider audience can be very instructional. Having multiple eyes evaluating my performance can only help me. I plan to have another video made in the near future and will again post it. I would like it to be “better done” than this first one. Hence the request for feedback.

You can give me feedback on the content, how I speak, voice cadence and dynamics, what I should do with my hands, posture, anything…I welcome your thoughts and suggestions.

Thanks in advance for helping me move down the slippery slope to media star!!

Posted in Administrative Experiences, Life Experiences, School Climate | Leave a comment

Playing Favorites

I think every kid at one time or another when they’re growing up feels like he/she’s being treated differently. This usually means they think they’re being treated unfairly, not being given the same reward, punishment, opportunity, etc. as everyone else. I’m sure that in some cases that’s true; unfairness does exist. But a majority of the perceptions are probably incorrect. Many situations are not accurately understood by young adolescents. Some students receive different consequences because they are repeat offenders. Some students are better at a particular sport so they are given the chance to play up a level. There are myriad considerations that go into making decisions that affect multiple kids, and many of these considerations are not easily perceived by those affected.

I learned a lot about fairness from my football coach, Coach K. In fact, I can say that I learned the value of complete fairness from him. His approach was simple, straightforward, easily understood by all: he treated everyone the same. It was obvious at every practice that he didn’t play favorites. We all had to do the same drills, we all were criticized as needed, patted on the back when merited, and given an equal opportunity to play. He based his decisions on what he saw from each of us in practice. This was true even given that there were some players who were better than the rest. I mean each year there were guys on the team who had earned League All-Star status the season before. They weren’t given any free passes. They had to perform.

Coach K was fond of saying that yelling at a player meant he believed that player had potential. You had to be concerned when he didn’t yell at you…that meant you weren’t showing anything that he thought would contribute to the team. You had to kick it up a notch if you wanted to be taken seriously.
We played eight man football at Lisbon, a format no longer seen. There was only one team, the varsity. We competed against other small schools, there were 52 students in my graduating class, in the north country, schools that didn’t have enough players to field modified or jv teams. If you wanted to play football, you tried out for THE team. My freshman year I sat the bench. I wasn’t good enough to play. I would get small amounts of playing time on the field at the end of games, if the game was out of hand. But I was treated fairly. I remember one practice when we were scrimmaging, I was playing defensive safety and this huge running back, Bobby Smithers, broke through the line, running straight at me. He was a starter, a tough kid. So I got in his way, my attempt at tackling him, and he basically hit me with his shoulder and ran over me.

Have you ever had the wind knocked out of you? It’s scary. You can’t breath. You lie there moaning until your lungs re-inflate. You think you’re dying. Well, after I got my wind back I was, to say the least, a little intimidated about re-entering the scrimmage. I approached Coach K and asked if I could sit out the rest of practice. I was, of course, told “no”. The only players allowed to sit out were those who had a legitimate injury, and I did not. I was going to get hit in games, I needed to get used to it. I needed to get right back on the field or I would never confront my fear.
Hmmm, ok. And I did.

Then when I was a junior, I was starting quarterback. But, with Coach K treating all of us the same, I played safety on defense and took part in kick-offs, punts, etc. It didn’t matter that I was an Honorable Mention All-Star the year before, and was a vital cog in our offense this year, I covered kick-offs too. So on one such kick-off in a game, I hit a guy with my shoulder and it went numb. I couldn’t feel my fingers, my arm tingled. I was pretty sure I had dislocated my shoulder. I went over to the sideline and mentioned to Coach K that I thought I had dislocated it. He grabbed my wrist with one hand, ran his other hand up under my jersey and shoulder pads and gripped my shoulder. He gave my arm a yank…a little pain but all the feeling returned. He said I’d be fine and sent me back into the game. (This would not be allowable today, but I’m talking 1971. A lot was different back then.)

Don’t get me wrong, Coach K cared about each one of us, but his caring didn’t interfere with treating us all the same. His fairness in treatment was legendary, all were aware. Everyone knew they would get a fair shot at playing. Your name didn’t matter, your past success didn’t matter, your personal feelings didn’t matter. You were just one equal member of a team, given an equal opportunity to contribute.
As I wrote earlier, I learned a lot about the value of fairness from Coach K’s approach. Once you treat someone differently you have set up a value system and you can never maintain it. Nor can you defend the unfairness of your actions. I learned that people can understand and appreciate equity of treatment, but they take serious issue with inequity. I learned that if you want to be respected, you have to start with being fair. I like to think that I continue to live by this lesson regularly today.

And that’s my perspective.

Posted in Life Experiences, School Climate, Student Characteristics | Leave a comment

Learning From Coaching

I was delighted to get the job. I was a pretty good basketball player, a teacher; I believed I would be able to put out some good teams and we would do well. I jumped at the chance. I stuck with it for three years, a period of time in which my teams won a total of 13 games…and lost close to 40. I should have backed out after the first year when I realized that I wasn’t ready to coach, but I had pride and couldn’t let it go. By the middle of my second season in this job I was miserable. I was much better informed about coaching, the many facets of coaching at the varsity level, the criticisms that inevitably arise, the unfair demands being made by parents, the lack of support that I and our program was receiving, you name it, I was learning it firsthand. And I was turned off to coaching. Partway into my third season I informed the AD that it would be my last, and the season couldn’t end fast enough.

One thing I can say about myself is that I’m a good learner, and those three seasons constituted an obvious “teachable moment” for me. I’m reflective now and I was then. My criticisms were all focused on me and rightfully so. My players were not an issue; they were what they were. I had some good ones, some not so good ones, but they did what I asked them to do. The AD wasn’t the issue; he gave me an opportunity I wanted. A case could be made that he shouldn’t have, that he knew I wasn’t ready, but he did…end of that story. I needed to examine myself, what I did and didn’t do, how I should have prepared better for practices, how I should have talked more with experienced coaches and been comfortable asking questions that would have showed my lack of knowledge, how I needed to acknowledge my players’ parents and worked to include them in my approach, how there was As educators, we generally recognize a teachable moment, one of those times that occurs regularly and upon which a lesson can be learned. I use the term “moment” because that’s the phrase everyone uses; teachable “moment.” It’s usually an occurrence, a happening, an event that takes place right here and now and can be reflected on immediately. We all have them, we all try to use them to provide a life lesson to kids, and sometimes the moment provides us with the life lesson. And it may not be anything close to a “moment,” but instead a lengthy time period that, when viewed holistically, constitutes a teachable experience rather than moment.

When I first started teaching I kind of figured that I would coach at some point. In high school I played football, basketball and baseball; when I got to college I played baseball for four years, JV basketball for one year, and intramural basketball for three years. I was an athletic guy who, surprise, enjoyed athletics. And I felt that I “knew” athletics as well…and maybe I did. Coaching athletics is another matter, however. I, like most people, believed that I could coach all right, I knew the games, I knew what it took to be successful at the games, I could apply my experience and knowledge from a coaching position and be successful.

In this regard, coaching is like teaching. Everyone and their brother thinks they know how to teach, primarily because they spent so many years in school. We all know what it takes to be a successful student, so all you need to do is share your experience and knowledge about learning with students. No sweat! Coaching is just a variation of teaching, and I had this very same attitude. No sweat!
I was provided the opportunity to coach the boys varsity basketball team my second year. community support had I only looked for it and asked for help. In short, I recognized that to be a successful coach you need to work at it, learn the basics of coaching before tackling the top level, and realize that coaching skills develop only with practice, patience, and study.

As fate would have it, a couple of years later I was ready to try coaching again and put into practice what I had learned. I offered to fill a JV girls basketball coaching opening and was given the job. You can be sure that I prepared for the first practice and I was ready with how we were going to approach practices and games. I coached this level for three years, and loved it. I didn’t relax, no, I approached girls JV with the same intensity I did boys Varsity. But I knew what I needed to do to prepare my team for success. We won our first four games then lost a close game…we won our next 35 games in a row! My second and third seasons we were undefeated. 39-1 over three years! Teachable moment indeed!

One of my memories from this period was a comment made to me by a parent of one of my top players. He used to attend practice, sit on the sidelines, watch how we did things. He never interfered. He asked me after practice one day if I knew why my girls were so successful. I started to given several reasons but he stopped me and said, “It’s because you treat them like they’re boys. You don’t take it easy because they’re girls, you don’t care less because they’re girls, like a lot of girls coaches do.”

I thought I just treated them like basketball players…

And that’s my perspective.

Posted in Administrative Experiences, Life Experiences | Leave a comment

The Value Of And Need For Quality Mentoring

You may be like me in that you have no interest in routine household jobs, have no tools to use even if you were interested in home repairs, and appreciate the value of those who can fix something in a short period of time. You may be unlike me, however, in that I’m fortunate to have a friend who is very talented at repairing just about any issue that can arise in my house. He’s reasonably priced, he’s responsive and timely, and he’s honest…good qualities in any tradesman. I have a problem, any problem, with my house, I call him. He came to me via a reference from a different craftsman who I had a lot of trust in. So if you don’t have such a talented crutch like I do, what do you do? You have a plumbing problem that you can’t, or don’t want to, fix, you need to find a plumber. Maybe you ask friends, maybe you google “plumbers”. But the important question: how do you decide which one to call? How can you know which one will have the qualities that my main man possesses? I mean, if a person is listed as a “plumber”, he must be good, right? How can you tell?

You learn a craft by practicing it. You learn it well by practicing it accompanied by support, insight, and advice by an experienced craftsman. I suppose it’s possible to become good at a job or trade solely by working on your own, but logic says that your level of “goodness” will not match the level of competence achieved with experienced guidance assisting you. I remember reading as a young student of the apprenticeship requirements that have been in place for ages in the skilled trades. The apprenticeships were completed under the tutelage of a skilled craftsman, with the objective that the apprentice would be guided and developed appropriately. Even today, in many trades a several year apprenticeship is required to be eligible for a license to practice that trade.

I write this while looking back at and considering my development as a teacher and subsequently as an administrator.  The undergraduate education course work I completed did not contribute much to my development as a teacher. Really, discussing methods for teaching math in a classroom with other inexperienced undergrads, and a professor who typically had little, if any, practical teaching experience, does not an apprenticeship make. Similarly, the graduate coursework I was required to complete for administrative certification did not directly help me learn to be a principal. In all fairness, it’s not that coursework doesn’t help in any way, because the readings and discussions do help you to begin looking at things differently. This is especially needed and helpful as one works to transition from being a teacher to being a principal. There are clear differences in the perspectives of a teacher and a principal, and classroom work can begin to delineate those differences. But, talking about making decisions is not nearly the same as actually making decisions. That’s where an apprenticeship becomes a crucial facet of development.

I had a good student teaching experience. I worked with an experienced math teacher who wanted his classroom routines mostly maintained, but who also allowed me to initiate my own approaches and practices. We discussed what I was trying regularly, and he was good at helping me think about the implications of my attempts. Even if, based on his experience, he was pretty sure something I wanted to try didn’t have much chance of being successful, he let me work it out. In any job, at any level, you will make mistakes, and learning how to recover from and rectify those errors is a necessary part of job maturity.

The same was true when I completed my internship in administration, working closely with the assistant principal. I was allowed to experience the different aspects of being an administrator, while being guided by an experienced professional. And I made more mistakes in this apprenticeship than I did in my student teaching!

But, student teaching, an internship, an apprenticeship, can only begin to shape you as a craftsman. You do not have “real” experiences during those training periods, those times when you are the one making the decision that others will be affected by, complain about, disagree with, and want changed, until you are no longer an intern, but are now THE person responsible. You are not on your own until there is no longer a skilled craftsman checking your work, or a classroom teacher standing in the background, or the real principal supporting what you’re doing. Like the plumber who just finished her apprenticeship and has just been called the first time for a job, you hope that your training will help, that something you were exposed to then is now relevant, that you will be able do the right thing. You hope that you are prepared…because now the real job begins.

And that’s my perspective.

Posted in Administrative Experiences, Communication in Schools, School Climate | Leave a comment

The Responsibilities Of Teachers

The average person probably looks at the responsibilities of being a teacher as teaching, I mean, that does make sense. And, of course, teaching means not only instructing five classes daily, but also providing extra support for those students who need it, whether they want it or not! So, teachers have to be available for their students at times other than during classes. For example, we have a built in after school time that is especially geared to provide extra help. Regular dismissal is at 2:17, teachers must be here until at least 3:00. Our district also provides late bus for transportation home for students. Right there is a tailor made support time of 43 minutes daily. Parents don’t even have to worry about picking their kid(s) up, we’ll bus them home!

There are other tasks as well that attend to “teaching”, such as providing work for students missing school, modifying work for very low ability students who are mainstreamed, maintaining and publicizing grades, collaborating with other support personnel, and a host of related instructional responsibilities. A lot goes into teaching that the typical non-educator never considers.

But here’s where my philosophy broadens. Teachers, all teachers, have responsibilities that extend beyond their instructional tasks as well. We all have an obligation to provide extra-curricular opportunities for our students. I blogged earlier about stipends, what they do and what they don’t do, but I’m referring to more than that. If we truly want to provide all students with a thorough, comprehensive chance to “grow up”, we need to involve ourselves in much more than teaching.

One of our priorities is that students have a need to “connect.” Each one needs to feel a part of something bigger. Kids have to have a reason to want to come to school every day and, no surprise, for many students that reason is not academics. When bad things happen in schools, you usually read after the fact that the kid responsible was a loner, wasn’t involved in anything, kept to himself, etc. In short, the kid wasn’t connected to anything positive in the school. I am not blaming the schools for this in any way, but it supports the need to provide opportunities for kids to connect and our responsibility to urge students to get involved in something. The wider the range of opportunities, the more students will find a connection of interest.

As educators we also have the responsibility, particularly at the junior high/middle school age levels, to expose kids to different experiences. Kids come from a wide range of households, some that provide their children with a wealth of opportunities, but many that provide little. It’s not that we are replacing what families should do, we are complementing and expanding on what they do.

Another facet of my beliefs is that teachers, and principals, need to be seen as more than just instructors, that we also have interests and hobbies we enjoy. In effect, we role model behaviors that we hope students will emulate. By involving ourselves in opportunities for and with students, we are also showing that we have an interest in kids beyond their content/skills learning. In other words, we care about our kids as more than just students. We want them to develop in different ways, we want them to have fun in school, we want them to represent our school in different programs, and we enjoy not only the activities, but also interacting with them!

Lastly, I firmly believe that, as educators, we have the responsibility to help kids grow physically, affectively, emotionally, and socially. We certainly have academic growth as our priority, but we need to attend to the many other aspects of growth that all students will experience. Many of the best developmental learning opportunities for these areas are not found in the classroom, but instead are found in clubs, events, and activities that create and call for different expectations for interactive behaviors from children. It is these different interactions that provide excellent growth opportunities for kids. And we are being remiss if we don’t recognize these needs and provide for them.

Good schools offer a wide range of experiences and opportunities for their students. And, good schools have (a majority of) staff members who recognize this crucial facet of education and who take an active role in providing for the comprehensive development of children.

Based on my experiences, that’s my perspective.

Posted in Administrative Experiences, Communication in Schools, School Climate, Student Characteristics | Leave a comment

Really, Commissioner?

The NYS Commissioner of Education, John B. King, Jr., recently posted a letter on a NY public access web site regarding the 2014 NYS assessment results, released in late August. Included in his letter are two scatterplots of all the New York State results by school, one graph for ELA and the other for math. Each school is displayed based on their 2014 percent proficient and their reported percentage of economically disadvantaged students. In other words, the scatterplots, which can be viewed along with King’s entire letter at engageny.org and which are reproduced here, show the relationship between academic achievement, as measured by the NYS assessments, and poverty:

Screen Shot 2014-09-21 at 10.22.20 AM

The relationship is fairly clear to see in both scatterplots; as schools’ poverty levels increase their achievement results decrease. This is not a universal surety, as there are always exceptions to any rule, but the trend is obvious.   And this trend is not shocking or contrary to historical data. Indeed, there is a clear correlation heavily supported by research between poverty and achievement. Students of poverty perform worse, in general, on all measures of academic achievement. I want to stress that there are exceptions to what research clearly indicates. There are, of course, economically disadvantaged students who do very well academically, in fact, some who do as well as typical wealthier students.

Commissioner King writes, however,

“These results make clear that those who claim that demography is destiny and that we cannot improve teaching and learning until we have first fixed poverty are simply mistaken. In New York, there are many examples of higher poverty/higher performance schools…this is not to imply that poverty is an unimportant factor – it is extremely important, for all of us. But the idea that poverty or family circumstances outside of school are insurmountable obstacles for teaching and learning is a fallacy.”

When considered only on the surface, his statement is meant to empower, to reinforce that poverty does not mandate poor performance for every student but instead that any student has the capability to rise above his/her poverty and succeed. Indeed, while accurate, his statement tends to remove poverty from the equation, which is misleading and even disingenuous. I encourage Commissioner King to read Savage Inequalities by Jonathan Kozol, in which the plight of East St. Louis schools is detailed. Kozol would agree that even in the poorest of schools there are individual students who rise above their poverty and succeed academically, but he would stress the obvious: that doing so is highly improbable.

And that’s where King’s message is misleading. Academic achievement is strongest where opportunities are richest. Where do opportunities abound? Not in poor districts, but in the wealthier ones. Money is needed to provide opportunities for students, to provide facilities that put students in a proper environment, to provide top quality teachers, to provide programs that allow students to stretch, to provide, well, to provide all that the students in wealthy districts have.   You cannot provide equal opportunities for students until you address the inequity of wealth between districts. Until you do that, students in poverty will not have anywhere the same opportunities and the trends seen in the scatterplots above will continue, if not worsen.

Commissioner King, let’s be honest. Your pep talk is empty until there is equitable funding for schools. You can attempt to encourage all you want but there will only continue to be the exceptions you mention in your letter. You cannot will away the link between poverty and achievement.

And that is my perspective.

Posted in Communication Clarity in Schools, Education Legislation, SED Regulations | Leave a comment

How’s Your Hometown Fit In?

Every summer my hometown of Lisbon holds “Old Home Week” over the course of a weekend in August. It’s a great example of small town Americana…there are town-wide garage/lawn sales, a parade Saturday morning featuring a lot of neighboring towns’ fire trucks and local old cars, a chicken BBQ at the fire hall, a school Hall of Fame induction takes place, an ice cream social at the White Church (yup, we actually have a church called the white Church!), and a lot of other little things taking place. And there are a lot of people. That’s the main idea, to get as many Lisbon natives as possible to visit their hometown. And a lot do. While I don’t attend “Old Home Week” every year, I do most years. Not for all the goings-on, although I do enjoy the parade, but to run into people I haven’t seen in a while. I can count on seeing old friends every year, some years more than others, of course.

I like seeing old friends, although I don’t have much in common anymore with most, and you can only talk about the “good ol’ days” so much. More importantly to me, Old Home Week provides an opportunity to get back to my roots, to remember the people and the events that played roles in shaping my development. I had a good time growing up in Lisbon, my memories are mostly positive, and even the not so positive ones have been tempered by time. I also feel that I owe my upbringing a lot and, while that is centered on my family and friends, my town and all that it encompasses was part of it. In all honesty I wouldn’t want to live there, but I have an allegiance to my town and my school and I appreciate all that my experiences shaped me. School was a major facet of my development. I especially feel an obligation to my teachers, who I don’t see too often at all, many are deceased now, but regardless, I feel I owe them a debt of gratitude. Having spent my career as an educator I appreciate so much what they provided to me.

So I struggle when I encounter people who forget about their early influences. I believe all of us need to remember those who helped us along the way. We are not forever indebted to them, but we shouldn’t forget about them either, and we certainly shouldn’t pretend they don’t exist. I recently had an experience that reinforced for me the need to keep people from my past in mind.

A graduate of my current district now plays baseball in the major leagues. I recently had the opportunity to see his team play two games in two different cities, Chicago and Detroit. In anticipation of this, via colleagues I was able to text him about a month ahead of time and let him know the two games I would be attending. I also said I wouldn’t bug him about it, but would love to see him before one of the games if he could work it out. I’ve been to many games and seeing ball players spending time with friends before games is commonplace. I didn’t receive a response to my initial text so about a week before the first game I texted him again with the details. The colleague who had supplied me with his contact info also contacted him on my behalf. Again, nothing. The first game came, I was interacting with some of his teammates before the game, but not him. The second game, the same story. To say the least, I was disappointed.

I know, he’s a major leaguer, he has obligations, he’s working to stay on the big team…I get all that. But really, two games within four days of each other in two distant cities? How many people from his hometown even do that? I believe that major leaguers owe something to their fans, especially the young ones. I mentioned in my texts to him that my girlfriend’s three young boys, ages 6, 9, and 11, would be with me. They would be thrilled to meet and speak with a major leaguer. What an opportunity for role modeling! He would be an excellent example for these kids that if you want something bad enough, you can achieve it. I was able to, you can also.   Wow, powerful stuff!

Even if I consider only the hometown angle, he failed. I don’t want to say he owed it to me, because he doesn’t owe me, specifically, anything. But he owes his upbringing something. I know that he had many educators who encouraged him, assisted him, pushed him to pursue his goals, and who helped him in his formative years understand that legitimate goals need to be worked for. Taking five minutes out of his day to acknowledge his background is little to give.

He needs to remember where he came from and that he makes what he does because of fan support.

And that is my perspective.

Posted in Administrative Experiences, Life Experiences | Leave a comment